dc.contributor.author | Cheshire, A.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Adler, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Barbière, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cohen, Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Evans, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jarayabhand, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jeftic, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, R.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kinsey, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kusui, E.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lavine, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Manyara, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Oosterbaan, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pereira, M.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sheavly, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tkalin, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Varadarajan, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wenneker, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Westphalen, G. | |
dc.coverage.spatial | European | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-07T22:31:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-07T22:31:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cheshire, A.C.; Adler, E.; Barbière, J.; Cohen, Y.; Evans, S.; Jarayabhand, S.; Jeftic, L.; Jung, R.T.; Kinsey, S.; Kusui, E.T.; Lavine, I.; Manyara, P.; Oosterbaan, L.; Pereira, M.A.; Sheavly, S.; Tkalin, A.; Varadarajan, S.; Wenneker, B.; Westphalen, G. (2009). UNEP/IOC Guidelines on Survey and Monitoring of Marine Litter. Nairobi, Kenya, United Nations Environment Programme120pp. (UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies, No. 186; IOC Technical Series No. 83). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-726 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-92-807-3027-2 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11329/1209 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-726 | |
dc.description.abstract | Globally our awareness of both the pervasiveness and magnitude of marine litter and the associated
environmental and social problems is growing (Ribic et al. 1992, ANZECC 1996a, GESAMP 2001,
Kiessling 2003, Cho 2005, UNEP 2005, OSPAR 2006, HELCOM 2007). This growth in knowledge is
being paralleled by a concomitant increase in the number and scope of national and international
marine litter investigations and assessment programmes. The objectives underpinning these litter
assessment programmes are quite diverse with groups/organizations variously targeting increased
public awareness, better understanding of the risks and impacts of litter, more understanding of litter
sources and sinks to support improved management and not the least, cleaner waterways and
beaches at local, regional, national and international scales. This variety in the purpose of assessment
programmes is matched by the diversity in the operational structure of those programmes.
Regardless of the underpinning motivation, marine litter investigations will generally fall into one of
three basic types:
1) Beach litter surveys.
2) Benthic litter surveys, which include:
a) Observations made by divers, submersibles or camera tows.
b) Collection of litter via benthic trawls.
3) Floating litter surveys, which include:
a) Observations made from ship or aerial based platforms.
b) Collection of litter via surface trawls.
Ultimately, to effectively manage and thereby mitigate the impacts from marine litter, there is a need to
develop a good understanding of the problems and specifically to increase our knowledge about the
principle types and sources of litter and the behaviours that result in litter entering the marine
environment. To achieve this aim, there is a need to ensure that good quality data are available that
will allow comprehensive analyses of the nature and sources of litter in marine environments and how
these vary through time and in response to management interventions.
In spite of growing interest and a mounting body of evidence from research and surveys, it is widely
accepted that a major factor that limits our knowledge of (and therefore the ability to manage) marine
litter results from inconsistencies in the design and delivery of sampling and assessment programmes.
These inconsistencies largely result from a lack of consistent objectives and litter classification
systems between alternative monitoring programmes (Ribic et al. 1992, ANZECC 1996a, Cheshire
and Westphalen 2007).
There is a growing need to develop standardized operational guidelines for marine litter survey and
monitoring programmes so that litter levels on our beaches and within our seas and oceans can be
estimated and interpreted through long-term, broad scale comparative studies that will support
management at both national and international scales. Similarly, given that marine litter management
ultimately relates to social and behavioural changes, there is a need to develop or maintain public
awareness and education through simpler, less rigidly structured, programmes.
Objectives
The objectives for this study were to develop a set of standardized operational guidelines for the
conduct of beach, benthic and floating litter assessments. In working to achieve this outcome it
became clear that there was also a need to address the different underlying purposes, particularly in
relation to beach litter assessments, and to that end we have developed two classes of surveys:
1) Comprehensive surveys for beach, benthic and floating marine litter
These protocols are targeted at the collection of highly resolved data to support the
development and/or evaluation of mitigation strategies in coastal and marine systems. The
protocol for these surveys includes a highly structured framework for observations at
regional, national and international scales.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
2
2) Rapid surveys for beach litter
This protocol comprises a simplified version of the comprehensive beach survey, targeted
primarily at developing public awareness and education about marine litter issues and is thus
not constrained by the need to fit within a broader spatio-temporal comparison framework.
Such surveys may be used as a vehicle for broader based community engagement and in
building community capacity when working towards inclusion within the comprehensive
survey framework.
In developing the guidelines marine litter was defined as any waste, discarded or lost material,
resulting from human activities, that has made it into the marine environment, including material found
on beaches or material that is floating or has sunk at sea. Some organic materials (e.g. faeces or food
waste) have been explicitly excluded and we do not include naturally sourced materials such as
vegetation (e.g. seagrass wrack, algae or river sourced trees and branches). Organic materials have
only been inc | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | United Nations Environment Programme | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Intergovernmental Oceangraphic Commision Technical Series;83 | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies,;186 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject.other | Marine litter | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Microplastics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Beach litter | en_US |
dc.title | UNEP/IOC Guidelines on Survey and Monitoring of Marine Litter. | en_US |
dc.type | Report | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.format.pages | 120pp. | en_US |
dc.description.refereed | Refereed | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Nairobi, Kenya | en_US |
dc.subject.parameterDiscipline | Parameter Discipline::Environment::Anthropogenic contamination | en_US |
dc.description.currentstatus | Current | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | 14.1 | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Manual (incl. handbook, guide, cookbook etc) | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Standard | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Standard Operating Procedure | en_US |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | https://www.nrc.govt.nz/media/10448/unepioclittermonitoringguidelines.pdf | en_US |