dc.contributor.author | Martins, Joana | |
dc.contributor.author | Cruz, Diogo | |
dc.contributor.author | Vasconcelos, Vitor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-26T21:43:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-26T21:43:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Martins, J., Cruz, D., and Vasconcelos, V. (2020) The Nagoya Protocol and Its Implications on the EU Atlantic Area Countries. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8:92, 20pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020092 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/1628 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1560 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of
Benefits Arising from their Utilization came into force in October 2014. In the European Union (EU),
new legislation had to be developed in order to apply the mandatory elements of the Protocol, namely,
the Regulation (EU) Nº 511/2014 (ABS Regulation) and the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866,
laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation ABS with regard to the register
of collection, monitor user compliance, and best practices. As a consequence, EU countries had to
develop their own legislation in order to implement the Nagoya Protocol (NP), as well as the EU
regulations. One important fact that distinguishes the national legislation of the EU countries is
that some countries choose to control access to genetic resources (GR), while others do not apply
access measures. The Atlantic Area countries in the EU share an attractive coastline with regard
to the potential of their GR. In addition, the microalgae industry has been identified as a business
sector with high potential. Therefore, it is important for GR users to be informed about the existing
regulations and the national di erences that may occur within EU countries. In this article, the origins
and main content of the Nagoya Protocol are described, together with their implications at the EU
level and particularly in the countries of the Atlantic Area region. As a result, a decision framework
is proposed in order to support the GR users among this region. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Interreg | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject.other | Biodiversity data | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Genetic resources | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Regulation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Interreg Atlantic Area | en_US |
dc.title | The Nagoya Protocol and Its Implications on the EU Atlantic Area Countries. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | en_US |
dc.format.pagerange | 20pp. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jmse8020092 | |
dc.subject.parameterDiscipline | Other biological measurements | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.title | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume | 8 | en_US |
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue | Article 92 | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | 14.a | en_US |
dc.description.eov | N/A | en_US |
dc.description.adoption | International | en_US |
obps.contact.contactname | joana martins | |
obps.contact.contactemail | joana.martins@ciimar.up.pt | |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/8/2/92 | |