dc.contributor.author | Goergen, E.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schopmeyer, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moulding, A.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moura, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kramer, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Viehman, T.S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-19T23:44:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-19T23:44:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Goergen, E.A., Schopmeyer, S., Moulding, A.L., Moura, A., Kramer, P. and Viehman, T.S. (2020) Coral reef restoration monitoring guide: Methods to evaluate restoration success from local to ecosystem scales. Silver Spring, MD, NOAA NOS, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, 145pp. (NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 279). DOI: 10.25923/xndz-h538 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/1713 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1643 | |
dc.description.abstract | As coral restoration efforts continue to increase in size and number, there is an overwhelming need to define restoration
success and determine progress towards successful restoration.
Meaningful, consistent, comparable, and quantitative data is
required to quantify the changes that result from restoration
actions. However, there may be many definitions of success
depending on the program or project goal(s). Restorations
can have one or many goals that can be very different (e.g.,
ecological, educational), and therefore, goals cannot be
addressed in a “one size fits all” monitoring approach. The
application of quantitative approaches to monitoring not only
provides a reliable way to evaluate progress towards restoration
success, but also provides means to identify problems and apply
adaptive management efforts as needed.
The CRC established a priority for the Restoration Monitoring
Working Group to develop guidance for monitoring coral
reef restorations and to determine restoration success. This
“Coral Reef Restoration Monitoring Guide: Best Practices
for Monitoring Coral Restorations from Local to Ecosystem
Scales” was developed for practitioners and programs in any
stage of their practice: from starting up a new restoration effort,
to scaling up current efforts, to improving efficiency. Coral
restoration practitioners can use the hypotheses- and datadriven
monitoring framework presented in this Guide to make
confident comparisons between projects, programs, and regions,
increase the efficiency of data collection, and make informed
decisions about the data necessary to describe the success of
the restoration goal or objective.
Two categories of coral restoration monitoring metrics are
included in this Guide: Universal Metrics and Goal-Based
Performance Metrics. The four Universal Metrics, Landscape/
Reef-level, Population-level, Colony-level, and Genetic and
Genotypic Diversity, are suggested as basic requirements for
monitoring all restoration projects, regardless of the goal of the
project. These metrics provide data on restoration scale, growth,
survival, and diversity, yet require minimal equipment and time.
These Universal Metrics should be monitored on any restoration
project regardless of the restoration scale, species, habitat,
location, expertise, or budget. Goal-Based Performance Metrics address five major coral
restoration goals: Ecological Restoration, Socioeconomic, Eventdriven
Restoration, Climate Change Adaptation, and Research.
Metrics are tailored within each goal to address key components
of the goal. For example, when monitoring a restoration with an
ecological goal, a practitioner should evaluate coral condition,
species diversity, habitat quality, and vertebrate and invertebrate
communities, and potentially others. Metrics are detailed for
each goal including key points, suggested methods, reporting
guidelines, and criteria to evaluate the performance towards the
restoration goal and towards restoration success.
Coral reef restoration, while a quickly growing field, is
still relatively new. This document is the first to provide
comprehensive guidance for monitoring coral restorations to
evaluate progress towards meeting restoration goals. Metrics
and associated methods developed herein are based on our
experiences, working group and workshop input, practitioner
interviews, and current published peer reviewed literature and
manuals. While every effort was made to address every situation,
we recognize that as this field develops and the metrics are ful ly
vetted, some metrics may need to be improved, modified, or
deemed unnecessary. We therefore encourage the evolution of
this Guide as a living document to be updated when necessary
to be relevant and representative. Our experiences and the
examples provided are mainly from the greater Caribbean
region; however, reviews and feedback from practitioners who
have worked globally indicate that the metrics developed are
applicable on coral restorations in all regions.
This Guide should be used to measure and describe the
progress of coral restoration projects towards meeting restoration
goals. The CRC Monitoring Working Group has also developed
a Coral Restoration Database and Evaluation Tool to be
complementary to this Guide and used together. The Coral
Restoration Database allows the input of comparable restoration
projects and monitoring data. The Coral Restoration Evaluation
Tool allows the practitioner to score the performance of their
project, program, or region and determine what is working
well and what needs improvement. The use of this Guide and
feedback provided by practitioners will improve the evaluation of
coral restoration success. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | NOAA NOS NCCOS | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-NCCOS;279 | |
dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject.other | Coral restoration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Monitoring | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Metrics | en_US |
dc.title | Coral reef restoration monitoring guide: Methods to evaluate restoration success from local to ecosystem scales. | en_US |
dc.type | Report | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.format.pages | 145pp. | en_US |
dc.description.refereed | Refereed | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Silver Spring, MD | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.25923/xndz-h538 | |
dc.subject.parameterDiscipline | Other biological measurements | en_US |
dc.description.currentstatus | Current | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | 14.2 | en_US |
dc.description.eov | Hard coral cover and composition | en_US |
dc.description.adoption | Multi-organisational | en_US |
dc.description.methodologyType | Method | en_US |
dc.description.methodologyType | Specification of criteria | en_US |
dc.description.methodologyType | Reports with methodological relevance | en_US |
obps.endorsementAuthorDeclared.recommendedPractice | NOAA | |
obps.contact.contactname | Elizabeth Goergen | |
obps.contact.contactemail | liz.goergen@gmail.com | |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | https://coastalscience.noaa.gov/data_reports/coral-reef-restoration-monitoring-guide-methods-to-evaluate-restoration-success-from-local-to-ecosystem-scales/ | |