dc.contributor.author | Swift, J.H | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-24T19:24:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-24T19:24:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Swift, J. H. (2010) Reference-Quality Water Sample Data: Notes on Acquisition, Record Keeping, and Evaluation. In, The GO-SHIP Repeat Hydrography Manual: A Collection of Expert Reports and Guidelines. Version 1, (eds Hood, E.M., C.L. Sabine, and B.M. Sloyan), 38pp. (IOCCP Report Number 14; ICPO Publication Series Number 134). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1346 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11329/376 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1346 | |
dc.description.abstract | Generating reference-quality water sample data involves procedures learned over years of
experience. Some simple-to-implement aspects of practice do, however, lead to improved reliability
and documentation of water sample data. These include:
• For water sample data
verification of the collection depth and unambiguous association of that depth with a unique
sample identifier,
understanding the degree to which the water which issued from the sampling spigot matched the
characteristics of the ambient water from the collection level,
verification that all data values associated with a water sample are correctly matched to the water
sample identifier, and
determination if the values for each parameter are correct.
• Data evaluation must begin at sea. This is usually the only time all involved personnel and all
records are together. Also, it is possible then to correct repetitive problems before they can
further degrade the data.
• The care of the data analyst and access to complete records are in general more important than
the specific scheme of data evaluation.
• The analyst must determine if the appropriate standards were met by the bulk of the data.
Emphasis should be placed on adherence to proven, documented methodology over agreement
with historical data. Quality standards should be applied consistently.
• The analyst determines which data values are suspect, partly by identifying outliers and assessing
their severity and cause, or finding that the anomalies are likely genuine. Suspicion of a data
problem based on a data value alone, without probable cause for an erroneous value, should
normally not of itself be cause to demote the quality of a value.
• Apparent problems should be corrected if possible.
1
• The analyst's report and a report of subsequent actions must be archived. These should be
added to a data report which also contains ancillary information about the cruise, a summary of
data acquisition and processing methodology, data quality information, and a complete list of
contacts for further information regarding the cruise, methodology, and the data. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | IOCCP Report;14 | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ICPO Publication Series;134 | |
dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject.other | GO-SHIP | |
dc.title | Reference-Quality Water Sample Data: Notes on Acquisition, Record Keeping, and Evaluation. | en_US |
dc.type | Report Section | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.format.pagerange | 38pp. | en_US |
dc.subject.parameterDiscipline | Parameter Discipline::Physical oceanography::Other physical oceanographic measurements | en_US |
dc.subject.instrumentType | Instrument Type Vocabulary::CTD | en_US |
dc.subject.dmProcesses | Data Management Practices::Data quality management | en_US |
dc.description.currentstatus | Current | en_US |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Hood, E.M. | |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Sabine, C.L. | |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Sloyan, B.M. | |
dc.title.parent | The GO-SHIP Repeat Hydrography Manual: A Collection of Expert Reports and Guidelines. Version 1. | en_US |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | http://www.go-ship.org/HydroMan.html | en_US |