dc.contributor.author | Carroll, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chigounis, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gundersen, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hayashi, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Janzen, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Johengen, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Koles, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Laurier, F. | |
dc.contributor.author | McKissack, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Meadows, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Metcalfe, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Robertson, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schar, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Seiter, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, G.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tamburri, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wells, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-29T14:19:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-29T14:19:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Carroll, M.; Chigounis, D.; Gilbert, S.; Gundersen, K.; Hayashi, K.; Janzen, C.; Johengen, T.; Koles, T.; Laurier, F.; McKissack, T.; Meadows, L.; Metcalfe, C.; Robertson, C.; Schar, D.; Seiter, J.; Smith, G.J.; Tamburri, M. and Wells, D. (2005) Performance Verification Statement for the Chelsea AQUAtracka III fluorometer. Solomons, MD, Alliance for Coastal Technologies, 37pp. (ACTTV02-06). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | [UMCES]CBL 06-048 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11329/811 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-367 | |
dc.description.abstract | Instrument performance verification is necessary so that effective existing technologies can be recognized
and so that promising new technologies can become available to support coastal science, resource management, and
ocean observing systems. The Alliance for Coastal Technologies (ACT) has therefore completed an evaluation of in
situ fluorometers designed for measuring chlorophyll. Chlorophyll measurements are widely used by resource
managers and researchers to estimate phytoplankton abundance and distribution. Chlorophyll is also the most
important light-capturing molecule for photosynthesis and is an important variable in models of primary production.
While there are various techniques available for chlorophyll determinations, in situ fluorescence is widely accepted
for its simplicity, sensitivity, versatility, and economical advantages.
As described below in more detail, field tests that compare manufacturer’s chlorophyll values to those
determined by extractive HPLC analysis were designed only to examine an instrument’s ability to track changes in
chlorophyll concentrations through time or depth and NOT to determine how well the instrument’s values matched
those from extractive analysis. The use of fluorometers to determine chlorophyll levels in nature requires local
calibration to take into account species composition, physiology and the effect of ambient irradiance, particularly
photoquenching.
In this Verification Statement, we present the performance results of the Chelsea Technologies Group
AQUAtracka III fluorometer evaluated in the laboratory and under diverse field conditions to in both moored and
profiling tests. A total of nine different field sites or conditions were used for testing, including tropical coral reef,
high turbidity estuary, open-ocean and freshwater lake environments. Because of the complexity of the tests
conducted and the number of variables examined, a concise summary is not possible. We encourage readers to
review the entire document (and supporting material found at www.chelsea.co.uk) for a comprehensive
understanding of instrument performance. However, specific subsection of parameters tested for and environments
tested in can be more quickly identified using the Table of Contents below. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Alliance for Coastal Technologies (ACT) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ACT TV; 02-06 | |
dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.title | Performance Verification Statement for the Chelsea AQUAtracka III fluorometer. | en_US |
dc.type | Report | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.format.pages | 37pp. | en_US |
dc.description.refereed | Refereed | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Solomons, MD | en_US |
dc.subject.parameterDiscipline | Biogeochemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.instrumentType | Fluorometer | |
dc.description.currentstatus | Current | en_US |
dc.description.eov | Ocean colour | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Best Practice | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Standard Operating Procedure | en_US |
obps.contact.contactemail | info@act-us.info | |
obps.contact.contactemail | tamburri@umces.edu | |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | http://www.act-us.info/evaluations.php | en_US |