Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrinker, Barry
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Shaul
dc.contributor.authorHassin, Assif
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T16:26:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T16:26:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGrinker, Barry, Solomon, Shaul, and Hassin, Assif (2022) Evaluation of a crowd sourced bathymetric approach. International Hydrographic Review, 28, pp.158-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58440/ihr-28-a08en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/2122
dc.description.abstractCrowd-Sourced Bathymetry is the process of generating a harbor chart through collecting, enriching, processing, and aggregating depth (and other) measurements from a host of vessels, using standard navigation instruments, while engaged in routine maritime operations. This study explores the accuracy and limitations of one particular approach towards utilizing Crowd-Sourced data, comparing the results obtained from DockTech’s approach to that of a classic MBES survey. As DockTech is a for-profit startup that sells their product to various stakeholders in the maritime supply chain, a balance between protection of proprietary interest and scientific collaboration is necessary. As such, while specific details in regards to both chosen methodologies and their particular evaluations cannot be discussed, a general overview will be provided and the results of DockTech’s solution will be evaluated. This study is based on depth measurements collected by service vessels, active on a daily basis in Ashdod Port over the course of two months. Tug and Pilot boats use stand-alone GNSS navigation and navigation class Single Beam echo sounders for safety purposes when traversing the port and maneuvering between the wharfs. These depths, averaged over a relatively rough grid, were used to produce a chart of part of the port. Data from the service vessels did not include RTK GNSS navigation and hence ellipsoid referenced surveying techniques were not used in lieu of water level monitoring. This chart was then compared to another chart produced from a professional hydrographic survey of the port, using state of the art equipment and strict hydrographic control. The differences were then analyzed according to the latest edition of the IHO S-44 standards. Recommendations were suggested for some relatively simple measures which could enhance the accuracy achieved and the reliability of such a chart, at least for harbor maintenance purposes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEU Horizon 2020; ILIAD Project
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.otherCrowd Source bathymetryen_US
dc.subject.otherHarbour charten_US
dc.subject.otherPasssage soundingsen_US
dc.subject.otherService vesselsen_US
dc.subject.otherIHO S-44 Standardsen_US
dc.subject.otherVoluntary observing shipsen_US
dc.subject.otherILIAD Projecten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a crowd sourced bathymetric approach.en_US
dc.typeJournal Contributionen_US
dc.description.refereedRefereeden_US
dc.format.pagerangepp.158-171en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.58440/ihr-28-a08
dc.subject.parameterDisciplineOther physical oceanographic measurementsen_US
dc.subject.parameterDisciplineGravity, magnetics and bathymetryen_US
dc.subject.dmProcessesData acquisitionen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleInternational Hydrographic Reviewen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume28en_US
dc.description.sdg14.aen_US
dc.description.maturitylevelMatureen_US
dc.description.adoptionValidated (tested by third parties)en_US
dc.description.methodologyTypeReports with methodological relevanceen_US
obps.contact.contactnameAdi Harush
obps.contact.contactemailharusha@docktech.net
obps.resourceurl.publisherhttps://ihr.iho.int/articles/evaluation-of-a-crowd-sourced-bathymetric-approach/


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record