Lead Detection in Polar Oceans: A Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Cryosat-2 SAR Data.
View/ Open
Average rating
votes
Date
2018Author
Dettmering, Denise
Wynne, Alan
Mueller, Felix L.
Passaro, Marcello
Seitz, Florian
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In polar regions, sea-ice hinders the precise observation of Sea Surface Heights (SSH) by satellite altimetry. In order to derive reliable heights for the openings within the ice, two steps have to be fulfilled: (1) the correct identification of water (e.g., in leads or polynias), a process known as lead classification; and (2) dedicated retracking algorithms to extract the ranges from the radar echoes. This study focuses on the first point and aims at identifying the best available lead classification method for Cryosat-2 SAR data. Four different altimeter lead classification methods are compared and assessed with respect to very high resolution airborne imagery. These methods are the maximum power classifier; multi-parameter classification method primarily based on pulse peakiness; multi-observation analysis of stack peakiness; and an unsupervised classification method. The unsupervised classification method with 25 clusters consistently performs best with an overall accuracy of 97%......
Resource URL
Publisher: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/8/1190Journal
Remote SensingVolume
10Issue
1190Page Range
17pp.Document Language
enSustainable Development Goals (SDG)
14.2Maturity Level
Pilot or DemonstratedSpatial Coverage
Polar OceansDOI Original
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081190Citation
Dettmering, D., Wynne, A., Müller, F. L., Passaro, M. and Seitz, F. (2018) Lead Detection in Polar Oceans : A Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Cryosat-2 SAR Data. Remote Sensing, 10:1190, 17pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081190Collections
- CAPARDUS Practices [244]
The following license files are associated with this item: