Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDettmering, Denise
dc.contributor.authorWynne, Alan
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Felix L.
dc.contributor.authorPassaro, Marcello
dc.contributor.authorSeitz, Florian
dc.coverage.spatialPolar Oceansen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-12T21:41:22Z
dc.date.available2023-06-12T21:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationDettmering, D., Wynne, A., Müller, F. L., Passaro, M. and Seitz, F. (2018) Lead Detection in Polar Oceans : A Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Cryosat-2 SAR Data. Remote Sensing, 10:1190, 17pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081190en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/2276
dc.description.abstractIn polar regions, sea-ice hinders the precise observation of Sea Surface Heights (SSH) by satellite altimetry. In order to derive reliable heights for the openings within the ice, two steps have to be fulfilled: (1) the correct identification of water (e.g., in leads or polynias), a process known as lead classification; and (2) dedicated retracking algorithms to extract the ranges from the radar echoes. This study focuses on the first point and aims at identifying the best available lead classification method for Cryosat-2 SAR data. Four different altimeter lead classification methods are compared and assessed with respect to very high resolution airborne imagery. These methods are the maximum power classifier; multi-parameter classification method primarily based on pulse peakiness; multi-observation analysis of stack peakiness; and an unsupervised classification method. The unsupervised classification method with 25 clusters consistently performs best with an overall accuracy of 97%. Furthermore, this method does not require any knowledge of specific ice characteristics within the study area and is therefore the recommended lead detection algorithm for Cryosat-2 SAR in polar oceans.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherMulti-Parameter Classification Method (MULTI)en_US
dc.subject.otherSatellite altimetryen_US
dc.subject.otherLeaden_US
dc.subject.otherSea Iceen_US
dc.titleLead Detection in Polar Oceans: A Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Cryosat-2 SAR Data.en_US
dc.typeJournal Contributionen_US
dc.description.refereedRefereeden_US
dc.format.pagerange17pp.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081190
dc.subject.parameterDisciplineCryosphereen_US
dc.subject.instrumentTypealtimetersen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleRemote Sensingen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume10en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue1190en_US
dc.description.sdg14.2en_US
dc.description.maturitylevelPilot or Demonstrateden_US
dc.description.adoptionNovel (no adoption outside originators)en_US
dc.description.sensorsCryosat-2 (CS-2) SAR altimeteren_US
dc.description.methodologyTypeMethoden_US
obps.contact.contactnameDenise Dettmering
obps.contact.contactemaildenise.dettmering@tum.de
obps.resourceurl.publisherhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/8/1190


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International