dc.contributor.author | Boerlage, Siobhan F.E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dixon, Mike B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Donald M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-19T00:37:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-19T00:37:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Boerlage, S. F.E.; Dixon, M. B. and Anderson, D. M. (2017) Case histories for Harmful Algal Blooms in desalination. In: Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and
Desalination: A Guide to Impacts, Monitoring and Management. (eds. Anderson D. M.; Boerlage, S. F. E. and Dixon, M.B.). Paris, France, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, pp.333-464 (IOC Manuals and Guides No. 78). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-316 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11329/759 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-316 | |
dc.description.abstract | Algae have long been an issue impacting desalination plant operation in areas prone to algal
blooms or where macroalgae (seaweeds) and detritus became dislodged from the seabed.
Previously and still today, operators and designers may elect to turn down production or shut
down SWRO plants, if contract obligations allow, when blooms are infrequent or of short
duration. Alternatively, in areas subject to frequent and prolonged blooms, additional
pretreatment such as conventional dissolved air flotation (DAF), hitherto designed for
brackish water applications, began to be employed as early as 1995.
The unprecedented 2008/2009 bloom of Cochlodinium polykrikoides in the Gulf of Oman
and the Gulf1, brought algal blooms to the fore in the desalination industry. SWRO plant
shutdowns were up to four months long as pretreatment processes struggled to remove the
increased biomass and produce the required RO feedwater quality. Apart from a few
exceptions, thermal desalination plants continued to operate without major issue throughout
the bloom, as phytoplankton blooms generally pass through intake screens and thermal
processes are very forgiving of source water quality. This was demonstrated at the Fujairah 1
hybrid desalination plant where the multi-stage flash (MSF) plant operated throughout the
bloom while the adjacent SWRO plant was shut down. Globally, harmful algal blooms (HABs) similar to the 2008 bloom of Cochlodinium
polykrikoides are increasing in frequency and severity (Anderson et al. 2012). Coupled with
the increasing use of RO as the desalination technology of choice, HABs have become one of
the major challenges facing the industry as RO membranes are extremely vulnerable to
feedwater quality, making pre-treatment exceptionally important. Smooth operation is
contingent on the selection of appropriate pretreatment processes upstream to remove
organics, solids, colloids and other foulants from the RO feedwater. The 2008 Gulf HAB
highlighted the limitations of conventional pretreatment based on ferric chloride coagulation
and single stage dual media filtration (DMF) in removing algal biomass and organics.
Ongoing research efforts to identify the algal organic matter (AOM) constituents responsible
for membrane fouling and measurement of their removal in pretreatment intensified. To this
end, the spike in AOM occurring during a bloom was found to comprise mainly of high
molecular weight biopolymers (polysaccharides and proteins), which include sticky
transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) (Myklestad 1995; Villacorte 2014). TEP have been
shown to form microgels with a high hydraulic resistance and are increasingly recognized to
promote biofouling of RO membranes (Villacorte 2014; Berman and Holenberg 2005; Li et
al. 2015). With the increasing adoption of low pressure microfiltration (MF) and
ultrafiltration (UF) membrane pretreatment, questions were raised as to their performance
during algal bloom events and how they compared to conventional pretreatment in removal of AOM.
In preparing the Manual and to address some of the above questions, operators, researchers,
and plant owners in the desalination industry were contacted as part of an informal survey
and invited to contribute
case studies related to their
experience with algal
blooms. As expected, it
became clear that algal
bloom issues were
predominantly encountered
in SWRO plants rather than
those using thermal
desalination. Twelve SWRO
plants (Figure 11.1.1) at
eleven different sites were in
a position to share their
experiences from a shortlist
of 30 sites that may have
experienced HAB issues.
Algal blooms, primarily phytoplankton, were reported in almost all geographic locations, in
cold and warm seas over a range of salinities affecting municipal and industrial desalination
plants. Notable areas affected include the warmer waters of the Gulf of Oman and the Gulf in
the Middle East. Case studies include Sohar and Barka 1 in Oman, Fujairah 2 in UAE and the
Shuwaikh plant located close to Kuwait’s most important commercial port in the upper
reaches of the Gulf where seawater quality is at its poorest. HABs are also commonly found
in the cooler waters off the coast of Antofagasta in Northern Chile supplying industry and drinking water for towns in one of the driest areas of the world.
Key insights from the 12 case studies are summarized below in terms of impacts experienced,
if any, in both conventional and advanced MF/UF membrane pretreatment plants during algal
blooms. Commonly recommended measures implemented in the industry to combat algal blooms are discussed in relation to the case studies mitigation strategies, and lessons learned.
This encompasses measures adopted during design and/or during plant operation, e.g. deepwater
intakes (Gold Coast), and DAF (Fujairah 2, Shuwaikh) and/or direct MF/UF filtration
(Jacobahaven, Sohar), or subsequently enacted in response to HAB events (La Chimba). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Manuals and Guides;78 | |
dc.rights | No Creative Commons license | |
dc.title | Case histories for Harmful Algal Blooms in desalination. | en_US |
dc.type | Report Section | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.description.refereed | Refereed | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Paris, France | en_US |
dc.format.pagerange | pp.333-464 | en_US |
dc.subject.parameterDiscipline | Parameter Discipline::Biological oceanography | en_US |
dc.description.currentstatus | Current | en_US |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Anderson, D.M. | |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Boerlage, S.F.E. | |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Dixon, M.B. | |
dc.title.parent | Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Desalination: a Guide to Impacts, Monitoring and Management. | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | 14.1 | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Manual | en_US |
obps.contact.contactemail | danderson@whoi.edu | |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | http://hab.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=22885 | en_US |